I'll never understand the revisionism on both sides of the KD thing. It's simple...
His 3 years in The Bay, he was the best player on that team. Not the most important. Not the leader. But he was the best player on that team. He should forever get his flowers for being the best player on a team that had Steph Curry, and I hate how we act like muhfukkas weren't alive and didn't see that Durant was a better player in real time...
At the same time, Curry has inched ahead of him historically, simply because Curry's resume without Durant, is better than Durant's without Curry. And, Steph has aged better too, he's the better basketball player now and has been for a couple years...
At the same time there is no massive gap between the two, people fronting like it is are lying. Steph's had a great career but it isn't so great that he should be viewed as if he's always been better than Durant, because he wasn't....
And yet at the same time, we have seen, now in the 14th year, Durant's not-Golden State career. It's a Hall one but isn't a Top 15 one, which is where most of us place him now. Granted this season isn't over, but in 14 non-GS years, that's a whole ass basketball career, he's 0-1 in Finals, 1-3 in WCF. Hasn't been out of Rd2, without GS, in almost 8 years. Has multiple playoff chokes on his resume outside GS...
He's a unique player with a unique career and word to the brother Soul, a lot of yall would hold him much closer to Harden if he didn't have the GS run...